🚀 Fauna Architectural Overview White Paper: Learn how Fauna's database engine scales with zero ops required
Download free ->
Fauna logo
FeaturesPricing
Learn
Customers
Company
Support
Log InContact usStart for free
Fauna logo
FeaturesPricing
Customers
Start for free
© 2024 Fauna, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
<- Back
E

Code Splitting in React with Lazy Components

Bruno Quaresma|Aug 16th, 2019|

Categories:

Use CaseEngineeringTutorial

Often during application development, we do not care much about the size of our bundle. However, as the code base grows, we need to think about it not only for speed and performance, but also to take responsibility for users’ data consumption—especially on mobile devices. So how do we load our assets as quickly as possible, and only when the user needs them, by taking advantage of concurrent browser requests?

blog post image

Font: https://docs.pushtechnology.com/cloud/latest/manual/html/designguide/solution/support/connection_limitations.html

A good option for this is to use the Code Split technique. This technique consists of splitting the code into smaller chunks and loading these chunks only when they are required. Let’s see a use case.

In Fauna Dashboard, we have pages where we are using code editors with heavy dependencies even after gzip. We do not want to put this in the main chunk, because this will make the first rendering longer and more costly than necessary on pages where the code editor is not needed. For this case, splitting code is a good option and I’ll show you how to do it without any headaches. To get started, let’s code something and run some analyses.

Let’s use create-react-app to start a new React project and create the components:

create-react-app lazy-demo
cd lazy-demo
yarn add @reach/router react-ace

App.jsx

import React from "react";
import { Router, Link } from "@reach/router";
import Home from "./Home";
import Code from "./Code";

const App = () => {
  return (
    <Router>
      <Home path="/"> />
      <Code path="code" />
    </Router>
  );
};

export default App;

Home.jsx

import React from "react";
import { Link } from "@reach/router";

const Home = () => (
  <>
    <h1>Home</h1>
    <Link to="/code">Go to code editor</Link>
  </> 
);

export default Home;

Code.jsx

import React from "react";
import CodeEditor from "./CodeEditor";

const Code = () => (
  <>
    <h1>Code</h1>
    <CodeEditor />
  </>
);

export default Code;

CodeEditor.jsx

import React, { Lazy } from "react";
import AceEditor from "react-ace";

import "brace/mode/java";
import "brace/theme/github";

const CodeEditor = () => (
  <AceEditor mode="java" theme="github" onChange={() => {}} name="code" />
);

export default CodeEditor;

Now let’s take a look at how our bundle is generated and how to optimize it using source-map-explorer.

yarn add source-map-explorer

package.json

"scripts": {
    "analyze": "source-map-explorer 'build/static/js/*.js'",
yarn build
yarn analyze

After running the analyses, we can see a simple chart in the browser:

blog post image

We can also look at the time it takes to load the page. For a better comparison, I’m loading this page with cache disabled and on a slow 3G connection.

blog post image

As we can see in the image, all our code is in only one piece. It does not use the power of parallel requests and loads unnecessary code the first time, which causes some delay in the first rendering. To do this, we can turn our CodeEditor component into a slow component.

LazyCodeEditor

import React, { Suspense } from 'react'
const CodeEditor = React.lazy(() => import('./CodeEditor'))

export default function LazyCodeEditor(props) {
  return (
    /* Here you can pass a better fallback if you want to. */
    <Suspense fallback="{<></>}>
      <CodeEditor {...props} />
    </Suspense>
  )
}
  • React.lazy allow us to do dynamic imports.
  • Suspense will render the component only when it is resolved. You can use the fallback props to pass a loader component.

So we’re loading the CodeEditor only when this code is called and not at build time. The Suspense component will wait for the CodeEditor to be resolved and display it, meanwhile displaying the fallback. Now, to see the difference, we’ll import the LazyCodeEditor instead of the CodeEditor and run some analyses again.

Code.jsx

import React from "react";
import LazyCodeEditor from "./LazyCodeEditor";

const Code = () => (
  <>
    <h1>Code</h1>
    <LazyCodeEditor />
  </>
);

export default Code;
yarn build
yarn analyze

We can see the brace and react-ace split into a different chunk:

blog post image

And we can see that initial load time has decreased.

blog post image

Our app only loads the chunks related to the code-editor when the user needs them:

blog post image

Now, we have an app which uses Code Splitting to have better performance and user experience as well. I hope you have enjoyed this article and it has been useful to you. Thanks for reading!

REFERENCES

Originally published on Bruno Quaresma Blog.


If you enjoyed our blog, and want to work on systems and challenges related to globally distributed systems, and serverless databases, Fauna is hiring

Share this post

TwitterLinkedIn

Subscribe to Fauna's newsletter

Get latest blog posts, development tips & tricks, and latest learning material delivered right to your inbox.

<- Back